HomeAI WorkflowsAppsManaged WebClient StoriesBlog Take the Assessment
Legal — Document Operations

Legal AI without the ALSP line item.

Document workflows for law firms, ALSPs, and in-house teams — contracts, leases, M&A diligence, eDiscovery, privilege, covenants — into iManage, NetDocuments, Relativity, Intralinks, and the CLM you already run.

See the WorkflowsTake the AI Assessment ↓
The Landscape

The Workflow Currently Routed to the ALSP

Most law firms and in-house teams route contract review, lease abstraction, M&A due diligence, eDiscovery first-pass, and privilege review to ALSPs — UnitedLex, Axiom, Elevate, Integreon, Consilio, Epiq, KLDiscovery, Cobra Legal Solutions — and to the Big Four NewLaw arms at Deloitte, EY, KPMG, and PwC. Onshore review attorneys cost $35–$65 per hour billed; offshore reviewers run $15–$30. The ALSP market is over $20B globally; a single M&A doc review can run $250K–$1M per deal. Templated, rules-driven document work with a privilege bar, a discovery bar, and a defensibility bar — that's the cell where AI workflows undercut the labor cost without changing the firm or in-house team's compliance posture. Last Rev replaces the ALSP line item, not the DMS or the CLM you already run.

Workflows

Pick the Workflow You Want to Replace

Each page below shows input, analysis, output, and the system of record we deliver into.

Workflow 01

Contract Review

Third-party paper reviewed against your playbook in 30 minutes — clauses extracted, deviations flagged, redlines drafted into iManage, NetDocuments, Ironclad, or DocuSign CLM.

Workflow 02

Lease Abstraction

CRE leases and amendments — 80–150 fields extracted and indexed directly into MRI, Yardi, VTS, or ProLease in hours, not weeks.

Workflow 03

M&A Due Diligence Review

Data-room contracts triaged for change-of-control, MAC/MAE, and indemnification — issues list into Intralinks, Datasite, or iManage in days, not weeks.

Workflow 04

eDiscovery First-Pass Review

Responsiveness, privilege, and hot-doc tagging across 200K–5M documents in Relativity, Reveal, Everlaw, or Lighthouse — without the contract-attorney review center.

Workflow 05

Privilege Review & Privilege Log

Attorney-client and work-product determinations with metadata-ready privilege log generation — defensible, claw-back-aware.

Workflow 06

Covenant Review

Credit and loan agreements abstracted for financial covenants, baskets, EBITDA add-backs, and cross-defaults — into your covenant-tracking system.

Workflow 07

Foreign Language Document Review

Mandarin, Japanese, Korean, German, Portuguese, and Arabic documents triaged for responsiveness — hot-doc translation and English summaries without the per-word cost.

Workflow 08

Patent Prior Art & Claim Charting

Element-by-element claim charts and invalidity contentions — anticipatory and obvious references located faster than a $1.5K–$5K offshore chart.

Workflow 09

Regulatory Submission Review

FDA, SEC, FINRA, and FERC submission packages reviewed for completeness, redaction, and prior-submission consistency before they go out the door.

Workflow 10

HSR & Antitrust Filing Prep

HSR threshold analysis, item-by-item form prep, and 4(c)/4(d) document collection drafted before the deal team grinds to a halt.

Systems of Record

We Deliver Into the Platforms Your Legal Teams Already Use

iManage Work NetDocuments Relativity Reveal Everlaw Lighthouse Intralinks Datasite Ironclad SpotDraft LinkSquares DocuSign CLM MRI / Yardi / VTS Moody's CreditLens FDA ESG / SEC EDGAR
Common Questions

What Law Firms & In-House Teams Ask Before Engaging

How is this different from Harvey, Spellbook, Kira, Luminance, or other legal-AI vendors?
Harvey, Spellbook, Kira, and Luminance are legal-AI tools, and we don't compete head-to-head with them in your evaluation. The competitor on this page is the ALSP first-pass review and abstraction line on your operating budget — UnitedLex, Axiom, Elevate, Integreon, Consilio, Epiq, KLDiscovery, or your captive offshore reviewer. We undercut that labor cost, integrate directly into your existing iManage / NetDocuments / Relativity / Intralinks deployment, and deliver structured artifacts (redlined Word docs, lease abstracts, privilege logs, issues lists) into the system of record. You own the workflow, the prompts, and the outputs.
We have a long-running ALSP arrangement or a captive offshore review center. How does this work alongside that?
Most firms and in-house teams keep the ALSP arrangement in place during pilot and early production — we route exceptions, complex high-risk paper, and out-of-playbook deviations to it. Volume to the ALSP drops 60–85% on routine commercial paper, lease abstracts, and first-pass review once cutover completes. You renegotiate at the next renewal from a much better position, or shift the relationship to higher-complexity work (cross-border deals, specialized regulatory review, native-speaker translation in unusual languages).
How do you handle privilege, work product, and the discovery posture?
Reviews and redlines run inside your environment with a privilege-aware audit trail. No outbound disclosure to third-party reviewer queues. Outside-counsel handoff preserves the chain when a contract escalates. Every clause extraction, deviation flag, and routing decision is logged with the source paragraph, model version, prompt, and confidence score — discovery-ready, FRCP-defensible, and yours.
Can you actually integrate with iManage, NetDocuments, Relativity, Intralinks, and the rest?
Yes — through the documented integration surface each platform supports. iManage Work via the iManage Cloud API; NetDocuments via the ndOffice and ndREST APIs; Relativity via the Relativity REST API and RDOs; Reveal, Everlaw, and Lighthouse via their published APIs; Intralinks and Datasite via their REST APIs. Your IT team reviews and approves a service account, and we connect through the documented integration. We do not require platform-side custom development.
How long until a pilot is running on a live matter?
A single workflow — contract review, lease abstraction, eDiscovery first-pass, privilege review — typically runs a 6–8 week pilot on a constrained scope (one contract type, one matter, one practice group). Production cutover happens when the pilot meets your accuracy and SLA bar. Multi-workflow rollouts are phased; we do not try to replace your entire ALSP stack in one go.
What does pricing look like compared to our current ALSP rates?
We benchmark against your current ALSP unit cost — typically $35–$65 per hour onshore or $15–$30 per hour offshore translated into per-document or per-matter economics. Our target is 30–50% of that per-document cost at higher accuracy and faster cycle time. Pricing structures around volume tiers and outcome SLAs, not hourly billable rates.
Is this a good fit for AmLaw 100 firms, mid-market firms, or in-house departments?
All three, with different framings. AmLaw firms use this on the ALSP partnership where review margins are thin. Mid-market firms use it to compete on cycle time without staffing up. In-house teams use it to keep routine commercial paper out of the ALSP queue and free outside counsel for the complex matters.

Two Ways to Start

Take the AI assessment if you want a structured read on where AI fits in your legal-ops or practice. Talk to us if you already know which workflow is bleeding the most ALSP labor cost.

Self-serve · 8 minutes

Take the AI Assessment

A short structured assessment that maps your legal-document workflows to AI feasibility and ROI. You get a tailored read in your inbox — no sales call required to see it.

Talk to a specialist

Talk to a Legal AI Specialist

Tell us your top three workflows by labor cost, your DMS or CLM, and your current ALSP arrangement. We'll come back with a per-document ROI model and a 6–8 week pilot plan in 5 business days.