Due diligence in 6 days, not 6 weeks.
5,000–50,000 documents in the VDR — material contracts, leases, IP assignments, employment agreements, litigation files — triaged for change-of-control, MAC/MAE, indemnification, exclusivity, governing law. Issues list and redlines into Intralinks, Datasite, or iManage. Replaces ALSP review teams at one-fifth the per-deal cost.
The 10-Attorney ALSP Review Team Reading the Data Room
The work the ALSP review team does on every deal — and the cost of leaving it there.
The labor
M&A due diligence today moves through ALSP review teams at UnitedLex, Axiom, Elevate, Integreon, Consilio, Epiq, and the Big Four NewLaw arms (Deloitte Legal, EY Law, KPMG Law, PwC NewLaw). A ten-attorney review team on a single mid-market M&A doc review runs $50K–$500K per deal; a large strategic deal can run $1M+. Pricing is hourly billable plus a project-management premium.
The cycle time
Standard ALSP review timelines run 4–8 weeks from kickoff to issues list — longer when the data room is mid-deal-loaded with new documents and longer still when the review needs to refresh after counter-proposed redlines. Every week the issues list isn't on deal counsel's desk is a week the deal team can't form a final view on indemnification caps, MAC/MAE language, or change-of-control exposure across the portfolio.
Input · Analysis · Output
What goes into the data-room review, what we do to it, and what shows up on deal counsel's desk.
The virtual data room
- Material contracts (customer, supplier, partner)
- Real estate leases and easements
- IP assignments, licenses, and patent portfolios
- Employment, consulting, and equity agreements
- Litigation files, settlements, and judgments
- Permits, regulatory filings, and consents
- Side letters, amendments, and prior diligence reports
Triage, classify, flag
- Document classification per the diligence checklist
- Change-of-control and assignment-restriction extraction
- MAC/MAE clause identification and language comparison
- Indemnification cap, basket, and survival extraction
- Exclusivity, non-compete, and ROFR identification
- Governing law, jurisdiction, and dispute-resolution flags
- Confidence score per finding; exceptions to deal-counsel queue
Issues list + redlines into the SoR
- Intralinks (REST API and reporting)
- Datasite (Diligence and Tracker APIs)
- iManage Work (matter-routed)
- Diligence checklist populated per workstream
- Top-issues memo with risk tier per finding
- Redlined critical contracts for the deal team
- Clause-level audit trail per finding
M&A Due Diligence Today vs. With Last Rev
The numbers that matter: cycle time, per-deal cost, accuracy, and audit posture.
| Dimension | ALSP Review Team | Last Rev M&A Due Diligence |
|---|---|---|
| Cycle time, kickoff to issues list | 4–8 weeks (longer with VDR refreshes) | 3–6 days |
| Per-deal unit cost | $50K–$500K (mid-market), $1M+ on large deals | Per-deal, benchmarked at 20–40% of ALSP unit cost |
| Surge handling on data-room refresh | Add reviewers, lose context, restart on overlap | Diff against prior review — only the new docs and material updates re-reviewed |
| Audit log per finding | Reviewer notes, no clause-level lineage | Source clause + finding category + model version + confidence per field |
| Coverage consistency across reviewers | Variable — judgment drift, calibration meetings, re-reviews | Deterministic — same diligence checklist applied identically every time |
| VDR integration | Manual export, separate Excel issues list | Direct via documented Intralinks / Datasite / iManage APIs |
| Renegotiation leverage at next ALSP renewal | None — you're locked in | 60–85% of first-pass volume off the contract |
From Data-Room Access to Deal-Counsel-Ready Issues List
Five steps. Every one logged. Every one reversible if your confidence threshold isn't met.
Built to Meet the Quality Bar Deal Counsel Already Runs On
What Deal Counsel Asks About M&A Due Diligence Review
How is this different from Kira, Luminance, ContractPodAi, or other M&A diligence tools?
How is this different from your contract review and covenant review pages?
We have an ALSP review team on retainer. How does this work alongside that?
What's your accuracy bar versus an ALSP first-pass reviewer?
How do you handle data-room mid-deal refreshes and supplemental disclosures?
Can you actually integrate with Intralinks, Datasite, and iManage?
How long until a pilot is running on a live deal?
What does pricing look like compared to our current ALSP per-deal rate?
Two Ways to Start
Take the AI assessment for a structured read on M&A diligence feasibility in your firm or in-house team. Or talk to us if you already know which deal workstream is bleeding the most ALSP labor cost.
Take the AI Assessment
A short structured assessment that maps your deal volume, typical data-room size, and ALSP arrangement to AI feasibility and ROI.
Get a Per-Deal ROI Model
Send us your typical deal volume, your VDR, and your current ALSP arrangement. We'll come back with a per-deal unit-cost comparison and a pilot plan in 5 business days.
More Legal Workflows We Replace
The same approach, applied to the other document-heavy labor lines on your legal-ops or ALSP budget.
Contract Review
Third-party paper reviewed against your playbook — clauses extracted, deviations flagged, redlines drafted into iManage or NetDocuments.
Lease Abstraction
CRE leases and amendments — 80–150 fields extracted and indexed directly into MRI, Yardi, VTS, or ProLease.
Covenant Review
Credit agreements abstracted for financial covenants, baskets, EBITDA add-backs, and reporting requirements — into your compliance system.
eDiscovery First-Pass
Responsiveness, privilege, and hot-doc tagging across 200K–5M documents in Relativity, Reveal, or Everlaw.