Covenant abstracts in hours, not days.
Credit agreements, amendments, intercreditor agreements, and security documents — financial covenants, baskets, EBITDA add-backs, restricted-payment limits, and cross-defaults extracted directly into Moody's CreditLens, nCino, or your covenant-tracking system. Replaces paralegals and ALSPs at a fraction of the per-agreement cost.
The Paralegal Stack on Every Quarterly Compliance Cycle
The work paralegals and ALSPs do on every covenant abstract — and the cost of leaving it there.
The labor
Covenant abstraction today moves through paralegals at deal counsel firms and ALSPs at UnitedLex, Axiom, Elevate, Integreon, Consilio, and Big Four NewLaw arms (Deloitte Legal, EY Law, KPMG Law, PwC NewLaw). Per-agreement cost runs $1,500–$5,000 depending on agreement length, amendment count, and intercreditor complexity. A regional bank's covenant tracking refresh on a $5B middle-market portfolio routinely runs into seven figures.
The cycle time
Standard covenant abstraction takes 5–10 business days per agreement at the paralegal or ALSP, with backlogs that grow during quarterly compliance cycles and amendment surges. Every day a covenant abstract sits in queue is a day the credit officer can't validate compliance certifications, the deal team doesn't know which baskets are utilized, and a borrower's restricted-payment exposure stays buried in a 200-page credit agreement.
Input · Analysis · Output
What goes in, what we do to it, and what shows up in your covenant-tracking system.
Credit agreement and ancillaries
- Original credit agreement (typically 100–400 pages)
- Amendments and supplemental indentures
- Intercreditor and subordination agreements
- Security agreements and guarantees
- Pledge agreements and mortgages
- Compliance certificates and prior covenant calculations
- Term sheets and commitment letters
Extract, calculate, flag
- Financial covenants (leverage, coverage, liquidity)
- Restricted-payment baskets and grower buckets
- EBITDA definition and permitted add-backs
- Reporting requirements and notice obligations
- Cross-default and cross-acceleration triggers
- Permitted indebtedness and lien capacity
- Confidence score per term; exceptions to credit-officer queue
Covenant tracker into the SoR
- Moody's CreditLens (REST API)
- nCino (commercial banking integration)
- Backstop Solutions (alternative-asset platform)
- Proprietary covenant-tracking systems
- Quarterly compliance certificate workflow
- Basket-utilization dashboard for the credit team
- Term-by-term audit trail per agreement
Covenant Review Today vs. With Last Rev
The numbers that matter: cycle time, per-agreement cost, accuracy, and audit posture.
| Dimension | Paralegal / ALSP Abstractor | Last Rev Covenant Review |
|---|---|---|
| Cycle time, agreement to indexed abstract | 5–10 business days per agreement | 30–90 minutes per agreement |
| Per-agreement unit cost | $1,500–$5,000 fully loaded | Per-agreement, benchmarked at 25–45% of BPO unit cost |
| Surge capacity (quarterly compliance, amendments) | Add headcount, queue grows, cycle slips | Elastic by design — no headcount ramp |
| Audit log per term | Abstractor notes, no term-level lineage | Source clause + cross-reference + model version + confidence per term |
| Amendment threading | Often re-abstracted from scratch | Amendments threaded by clause — covenant impact recomputed |
| System of record integration | Excel deliverable, manual re-keying into CreditLens / nCino | Direct via documented Moody's CreditLens / nCino APIs |
| Renegotiation leverage at next ALSP renewal | None — you're locked in | 60–85% of abstraction volume off the contract |
From Credit Agreement to Tracked Covenant
Five steps. Every one logged. Every one reversible if your confidence threshold isn't met.
Built to Meet the Quality Bar Credit & Compliance Already Run On
What Lenders, Funds & Borrowers Ask About Covenant Review
How is this different from Moody's CreditLens, nCino, or other covenant-tracking platforms?
How is this different from your contract review and M&A due diligence pages?
We have a paralegal team or ALSP arrangement running today. How does this work alongside that?
What's your accuracy bar versus a paralegal or ALSP abstractor?
How do you handle amendment cycles and basket-utilization tracking over time?
Can you actually integrate with Moody's CreditLens, nCino, and proprietary covenant trackers?
How long until a pilot is running on a live portfolio?
What does pricing look like compared to our current per-agreement abstraction rate?
Two Ways to Start
Take the AI assessment for a structured read on covenant-review feasibility on your portfolio. Or talk to us if you already know which agreement type is bleeding the most paralegal labor.
Take the AI Assessment
A short structured assessment that maps your portfolio size, current per-agreement abstraction cost, and covenant-tracking system to AI feasibility and ROI.
Get a Per-Agreement ROI Model
Send us your portfolio size, your current paralegal or ALSP arrangement, and your covenant-tracking system. We'll come back with a per-agreement unit-cost comparison and a pilot plan in 5 business days.
More Legal Workflows We Replace
The same approach, applied to the other document-heavy labor lines on your legal-ops or ALSP budget.
Lease Abstraction
CRE leases and amendments — 80–150 fields extracted and indexed directly into MRI, Yardi, VTS, or ProLease.
Contract Review
Third-party paper reviewed against your playbook — clauses extracted, deviations flagged, redlines drafted into iManage or NetDocuments.
M&A Due Diligence Review
Data-room contracts triaged for change-of-control, MAC/MAE, and indemnification — issues list into Intralinks or Datasite in days.
Regulatory Submission
FDA, SEC, FINRA, FERC submissions reviewed for completeness, redaction, and prior-submission consistency before they go out the door.