Workflow — Estimate Review

Xactimate review at one-fifth the cost.

Xactimate, Symbility, and Verisk 360Value line-item review against unit-cost databases. Scope, supplements, and price-padding flagged before the estimate hits the adjuster.

$40–$120
Per estimate at IA desk reviewers (Eberl, Crawford, Pilot)
$60–$150
Per file during CAT surge with surge-staffed IAs
60–85%
Volume off the IA line after cutover
What This Replaces

The IA Desk Reviewer Doing Per-Estimate Triage

The work the IA desk reviewer does on every Xactimate estimate — and the cost of leaving it there.

The labor

Estimate review today moves through desk reviewers at Eberl, Crawford, Pilot, Worley, and captive desk-review teams. Per-file cost: $40–$120 per estimate in normal times, $60–$150 per file during CAT surge with thousands of contracted IAs.

The cycle time

Routine reviews take 2–7 days. CAT surge stretches that to weeks. Every day the estimate sits is a day the customer's repair is delayed, supplements pile up, and reserve estimates drift from reality.

The Workflow

Input · Analysis · Output

What goes in, what we do to it, and what shows up in your claims system.

Input

Contractor estimate & documentation

  • Xactimate ESX files
  • Symbility estimates
  • Verisk 360Value packages
  • Photos of damage (typically 30–200 per claim)
  • Scope of work narrative
  • Prior-claim history and policy details
  • Supplements and rebuild-vs-repair packages
Analysis

Validate, match, flag

  • Line-item extraction with quantity, unit cost, selector
  • Regional unit-cost database cross-check
  • Scope-of-work matched to photo evidence
  • Carrier-specific guideline application
  • Price-padding pattern detection
  • Supplemental request identification
  • Confidence threshold routing to adjuster
Output

Approved estimate into the SoR

  • Approved estimate into Guidewire ClaimCenter
  • Duck Creek Claims (OnDemand APIs)
  • Origami Risk (REST API)
  • Snapsheet (partner integration)
  • Supplements queue with flagged items
  • Source-line citations on every validation
  • Field-level audit log per estimate
Side by Side

Estimate Review Today vs. With Last Rev

The numbers that matter: cycle time, per-file cost, surge capacity, and audit posture.

Dimension IA Desk ReviewerLast Rev Estimate Review
Cycle time per estimate 2–7 days routine, weeks in CAT15–60 minutes per estimate
Per-estimate cost $40–$120 routine, $60–$150 CAT30–50% of IA unit cost, volume-tiered
CAT surge capacity Surge-staff thousands of IAsElastic by design
Photo-to-scope matching Reviewer-dependent, sometimes skippedPhotos matched to scope items, every estimate
Price-padding detection Inconsistent, reviewer-dependentPattern-based flags with prior-claim cross-reference
System of record integration Manual entry, sometimes mailed PDFsDirect via documented Guidewire / Duck Creek / Origami APIs
Renegotiation leverage at next IA renewal None — locked in60–85% of estimate volume off the contract
How It Works

From Estimate Receipt to Approved Reserve

Five steps. Every one logged. Every one reversible if your confidence threshold isn't met.

Estimate Lands
Contractor's Xactimate, Symbility, or Verisk 360Value estimate, scope of work, photos of damage, and prior-claim history. Single estimates, supplements, and rebuild-vs-repair packages — all formats supported.
Line-Item Extraction & Validation
Every line item extracted with quantity, unit cost, region, and selector. Cross-checked against the regional unit-cost database. Scope of work matched to photo evidence. Supplemental requests identified and tagged.
Validation Against Carrier Rules
Carrier-specific guideline application — code upgrades, betterment splits, depreciation rules, sublimits. Price-padding patterns flagged (over-quantity, scope creep, repeat-line items). Anything below your confidence threshold per field is routed to a human exception queue — your call which queue, ours or yours.
Push to System of Record
Approved estimate delivered into Guidewire ClaimCenter, Duck Creek Claims, Origami Risk, or Snapsheet via the documented integration. Supplements queue routing for items requiring human review. Adjuster work product on top of the structured data.
Audit Log Persisted
Every line item, unit-cost validation, scope match, and supplemental flag traces back to the source line in the original estimate. Model version, prompt, and confidence score recorded. Defensible against fee-bill review and DOI exam.
Compliance & Defensibility

Built to Meet the Quality Bar Property Claims Operations Run On

State DOI & fair-claims-practices acts
Field-level audit trail by estimate, model version recorded against every line-item validation, defensible chain of custody for examiner requests and bad-faith defense.
Code-upgrade & betterment splits
State and local code-upgrade rules applied per jurisdiction. Betterment and depreciation splits calculated against carrier-specific guidelines.
Discovery defensibility
Every line-item allowance and disallowance traces to source data — the line in the estimate, the unit-cost reference, the photo evidence. Holds up to litigation and DOI exam.
Data residency & PII handling
Deployable in your VPC or our SOC 2 environment. PII redacted before logging; encryption in transit and at rest; retention policies tied to your DOI guidance.
Common Questions

What Carriers Ask About Estimate Review

How is this different from Xactimate's own analytics, Verisk 360Value, or Mitchell?
Those vendors provide the estimating platform and the unit-cost data — that's the foundation we build on. The competitor on this page is the IA desk-reviewer line on your operating budget — typically reviewers at Eberl, Crawford, Pilot, Worley, or your captive desk-review team at $40–$120 per estimate. We replace that labor cost, integrate directly into your existing claims system, and deliver an approved estimate or supplement into the system of record.
We have a contract with an IA firm for desk review. How does this work alongside it?
Most carriers run AI on the front of the funnel — unit-cost validation, scope matching, price-padding detection — and route exceptions to the IA desk reviewer. Volume to the IA firm drops 60–85% on routine estimate reviews once cutover completes. Your IA contract is unchanged in pilot and early production — you renegotiate at the next renewal from a much better position, or shift the contract to higher-complexity reviews (large-loss, contested, supplements with disputed scope).
What's your accuracy bar versus an IA desk reviewer?
Our pilot success threshold is structured-field extraction and validation accuracy at parity with or above your incumbent IA, measured on the same shadow-data sample. We don't make the final scope-allowance determination — we tag the estimate with line-item validations, scope matches, and price-padding flags with source citations, so your adjuster makes the call on a richer file than they get from offshore desk review today. Anything below your defined confidence threshold per field is routed to a human exception queue.
Can you actually integrate with Xactimate, Symbility, and Verisk 360Value?
Yes — through the documented file formats and integration surfaces each platform supports. Xactimate via ESX file format and the XactAnalysis integration. Symbility via their cloud sync and integration framework. Verisk 360Value via their API. Your IT team reviews and approves a service account, and we connect through the documented integration. We do not require platform-side custom development.
What about catastrophe surge and large-loss complexity?
CAT surge is where the per-estimate ROI math gets strongest. During a named storm, estimates pile up, IA firms surge-staff with thousands of contractors at $60–$150 per file, and turnaround times stretch into weeks. Volume scales linearly with us — no headcount ramp, no degraded quality. Large-loss complexity (commercial structures, multi-unit, code upgrades, business interruption tie-ins) routes to your senior adjuster or specialty reviewer with a structured workup attached.
How long until a pilot is live?
Estimate-review pilots typically run 6–8 weeks: 1–2 weeks of integration and rule mapping (which carriers, which states, which carrier-specific guidelines, which price-padding tolerances), 4 weeks of shadow-mode running on real estimates with no system-of-record writes, 1–2 weeks of supervised cutover on a constrained book (one LOB, one region, defined estimate-size band). Production rollout is staged after the pilot meets your accuracy and SLA bar.
What's the per-estimate pricing structure?
We benchmark against your current per-estimate IA review cost — typically $40–$120 per estimate at IA desk reviewers, higher during CAT surge. Our target is 30–50% of that per-estimate cost at higher accuracy and faster cycle time. Pricing structures around volume tiers and outcome SLAs, not hourly billable rates.
Is this a good fit for property + liability + auto, or only property?
Property is the densest workflow today. Auto estimates use CCC Intelligent and Mitchell — same approach applies, different unit-cost databases and damage-photo coding. Liability claims with a property-damage component (commercial liability, marine, construction defect) ride on the property workflow. We support all of them; the per-LOB onboarding is straightforward once the first one is live.

Two Ways to Start

Take the AI assessment for a structured read on estimate-review feasibility in your operation. Or talk to us if you already know which IA contract is bleeding the most cost.

Other Workflows

More Insurance Workflows We Replace

The same approach, applied to the other claims-document labor lines on your operating budget.